journal of Psychology new Ideas
فصلنامه ایده های نوین روانشناسی
JNIP
Literature & Humanities
http://jnip.ir
1
admin
2588-3356
8
7
14
8888
13
fa
jalali
1400
6
1
gregorian
2021
9
1
9
13
online
1
fulltext
fa
Critical Comparison of Two qualitative study with hermeneutic phenomenology Method Qualitative Studies
Critical Comparison of Two qualitative study with hermeneutic phenomenology Method Qualitative Studies
تخصصي
Special
پژوهشي
Research
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman,serif;">Current educational psychology scholarship lacks critical comparisons of empirical studies using the methodology of hermeneutic phenomenology, which has been increasingly applied in psychology, education, and sociology. Unclarity and confusion in applying this methodology has negatively affected both theoretical and empirical studies that employ this method. To help fill this gap, the present paper critically compares two culturally different hermeneutic phenomenological studies by scholars from different fields: a psychological study from Iran and an educational study from Indonesia. We analyze the similarities and differences of the authors’ philosophical assumptions, including ontological, epistemological, axiological, and methodological assumptions as well as the interpretative and/or conceptual frame and rigors of the two studies. Our comparison and analysis reveal that the Iranian psychological study was stronger in applying the method but weaker in explaining the theory, while the Indonesian educational study comprehensively explained the theory without providing strong empirical evidence. </span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">Current educational psychology scholarship lacks critical comparisons of empirical studies using the methodology of hermeneutic phenomenology, which has been increasingly applied in psychology, education, and sociology. Unclarity and confusion in applying this methodology has negatively affected both theoretical and empirical studies that employ this method. To help fill this gap, the present paper critically compares two culturally different hermeneutic phenomenological studies by scholars from different fields: a psychological study from Iran and an educational study from Indonesia. We analyze the similarities and differences of the authors’ philosophical assumptions, including ontological, epistemological, axiological, and methodological assumptions as well as the interpretative and/or conceptual frame and rigors of the two studies. Our comparison and analysis reveal that the Iranian psychological study was stronger in applying the method but weaker in explaining the theory, while the Indonesian educational study comprehensively explained the theory without providing strong empirical evidence. </div>
Hermeneutic phenomenology, ontology, epistemology, methodology, axiology, interpretive frame, conceptual frame
Hermeneutic phenomenology, ontology, epistemology, methodology, axiology, interpretive frame, conceptual frame.
0
0
http://jnip.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-132-162&slc_lang=fa&sid=1
Nadia
Khalili
Nadia
Khalili
10031947532846001334
10031947532846001334
Yes
Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University,. Montreal,Canada
Diana
Khalili
Diana
Khalili
10031947532846001335
10031947532846001335
No
Payam Noor University,Karaj,Iran
Payam Noor University,Karaj,Iran